<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MRE 2018 | MOE - Misión de Observación Electoral</title>
	<atom:link href="https://new.moe.org.co/categoria/mre-2018/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://new.moe.org.co</link>
	<description>Información política y electoral de Colombia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 22:08:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>es</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Mapas y factores de riesgo electoral. Elecciones Nacionales Colombia 2018</title>
		<link>https://new.moe.org.co/mapa-riesgo-electoral-2018/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mapa-riesgo-electoral-2018</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Comunicaciones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 14:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Comunicados de prensa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mapas de riesgo electoral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRE 2018]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datos electorales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riesgos electorales]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://new.moe.org.co/?p=2727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[La Misión de Observación Electoral MOE, presentó los “Mapas y factores de Riesgo Electoral- Elecciones Congreso y Presidente 2018”, en el que señalan 170 municipios en los que confluyen riesgos electorales indicativos de fraude y riesgos por factores de violencia, siendo esta la menor cifra registrada hasta el momento en la historia de la MOE.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><em>En 170 municipios coinciden riesgos electorales tanto por factores indicativos de fraude y por factores de violencia. </em></li>
<li><em>Estas elecciones registran el menor nivel de riesgo de violencia desde que la MOE hace esta medición.</em></li>
<li><em>En 31 municipios los riesgos por factores indicativos de fraude electoral disminuyen tanto en elecciones de Cámara como en Senado.</em></li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-2727"></span></p>
<p><strong>Bogotá 8 de febrero de 2017. </strong>La Misión de Observación Electoral MOE presentó los “Mapas y factores de Riesgo Electoral- Elecciones Congreso y Presidente 2018”, en el que señalan 170 municipios en los que confluyen riesgos electorales indicativos de fraude y riesgos por factores de violencia, siendo esta la menor cifra registrada hasta el momento en la historia de la MOE.</p>
<p>Aunque el número de municipios en riesgo consolidado disminuyó frente a las anteriores elecciones de 2014, en donde se tenían 260 municipios, el nivel de riesgo extremo aumentó en 14 municipios, pasando de 50 en 2014, a 64 para los procesos electorales que se avecinan.</p>
<p>De acuerdo a Alejandra Barrios Cabrera, directora nacional de la MOE, “los riesgos electorales pasaron de ser corredores que atravesaban importantes zonas del país a ser regiones específicas en las que se concentran economías ilegales y diferentes actores armados”.</p>
<p>La MOE solicitó al Gobierno Nacional, a las autoridades electorales y a medios de comunicación, especial atención a estos 170 municipios de los cuales 64 están en riesgo extremo, 65 en riesgo alto y 41 en riesgo medio.</p>
<div id="attachment_2737" style="width: 663px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-2737" class="size-full wp-image-2737" src="https://www.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Riesgo_consolidado.png" alt="Municipios donde confluyen riesgos de violencia y de fraude" width="653" height="801" srcset="https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Riesgo_consolidado.png 653w, https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Riesgo_consolidado-245x300.png 245w, https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Riesgo_consolidado-440x540.png 440w, https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Riesgo_consolidado-585x718.png 585w" sizes="(max-width: 653px) 100vw, 653px" /><p id="caption-attachment-2737" class="wp-caption-text">Municipios donde confluyen riesgos de violencia y de fraude</p></div>
<table width="607">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" width="607"><strong>Riesgo por coincidencias de factores indicativos de fraude electoral y de violencia</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" width="27">#</td>
<td rowspan="2" width="109"><strong>Departamento</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="75"><strong>No. de municipios</strong></td>
<td colspan="3" width="205"><strong>Nivel de riesgo</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="94"><strong>Total  de municipios en riesgo</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="95"><strong>Porcentaje del departamento en riesgo</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69"><strong>Medio</strong></td>
<td width="67"><strong>Alto</strong></td>
<td width="70"><strong>Extremo</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>1</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Guaviare</strong></td>
<td width="75">4</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="70">3</td>
<td width="94">4</td>
<td width="95">100%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>2</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Arauca</strong></td>
<td width="75">7</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="70">3</td>
<td width="94">4</td>
<td width="95">57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>3</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Caquetá</strong></td>
<td width="75">16</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">6</td>
<td width="70">1</td>
<td width="94">7</td>
<td width="95">44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>4</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Meta</strong></td>
<td width="75">29</td>
<td width="69">3</td>
<td width="67">5</td>
<td width="70">3</td>
<td width="94">11</td>
<td width="95">38%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>5</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Cauca</strong></td>
<td width="75">42</td>
<td width="69">3</td>
<td width="67">8</td>
<td width="70">2</td>
<td width="94">13</td>
<td width="95">31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>6</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Putumayo</strong></td>
<td width="75">13</td>
<td width="69">1</td>
<td width="67">3</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">4</td>
<td width="95">31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>7</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Chocó</strong></td>
<td width="75">30</td>
<td width="69">1</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="70">7</td>
<td width="94">9</td>
<td width="95">30%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>8</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Córdoba</strong></td>
<td width="75">30</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">5</td>
<td width="70">4</td>
<td width="94">9</td>
<td width="95">30%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>9</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Antioquia</strong></td>
<td width="75">125</td>
<td width="69">13</td>
<td width="67">9</td>
<td width="70">13</td>
<td width="94">35</td>
<td width="95">28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>10</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Nariño</strong></td>
<td width="75">64</td>
<td width="69">3</td>
<td width="67">9</td>
<td width="70">6</td>
<td width="94">18</td>
<td width="95">28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>11</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Norte de Santander</strong></td>
<td width="75">40</td>
<td width="69">1</td>
<td width="67">2</td>
<td width="70">8</td>
<td width="94">11</td>
<td width="95">28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>12</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Vichada</strong></td>
<td width="75">4</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">1</td>
<td width="95">25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>13</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Risaralda</strong></td>
<td width="75">14</td>
<td width="69">1</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="70">1</td>
<td width="94">3</td>
<td width="95">21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>14</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Bolívar</strong></td>
<td width="75">46</td>
<td width="69">4</td>
<td width="67">3</td>
<td width="70">2</td>
<td width="94">9</td>
<td width="95">20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>15</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Sucre</strong></td>
<td width="75">26</td>
<td width="69">2</td>
<td width="67">2</td>
<td width="70">1</td>
<td width="94">5</td>
<td width="95">19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>16</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Vaupés</strong></td>
<td width="75">6</td>
<td width="69">1</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">1</td>
<td width="95">17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>17</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Tolima</strong></td>
<td width="75">47</td>
<td width="69">2</td>
<td width="67">3</td>
<td width="70">1</td>
<td width="94">6</td>
<td width="95">13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>18</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Casanare</strong></td>
<td width="75">19</td>
<td width="69">1</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">2</td>
<td width="95">11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>19</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Valle del Cauca</strong></td>
<td width="75">42</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70">4</td>
<td width="94">4</td>
<td width="95">10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>20</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Quindío</strong></td>
<td width="75">12</td>
<td width="69">1</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">1</td>
<td width="95">8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>21</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>La Guajira</strong></td>
<td width="75">15</td>
<td width="69"> &#8211;</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70"> 1</td>
<td width="94">1</td>
<td width="95">7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>22</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Atlántico</strong></td>
<td width="75">23</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">1</td>
<td width="95">4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>23</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Cesar</strong></td>
<td width="75">25</td>
<td width="69">1</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">1</td>
<td width="95">4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>24</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Santander</strong></td>
<td width="75">87</td>
<td width="69">1</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70">2</td>
<td width="94">3</td>
<td width="95">3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>25</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Magdalena</strong></td>
<td width="75">30</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70">1</td>
<td width="94">1</td>
<td width="95">3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>26</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Huila</strong></td>
<td width="75">37</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">1</td>
<td width="95">3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>27</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Cundinamarca</strong></td>
<td width="75">116</td>
<td width="69">2</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">2</td>
<td width="95">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>28</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Boyacá</strong></td>
<td width="75">123</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">2</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">2</td>
<td width="95">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>29</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Bogotá D.C.</strong></td>
<td width="75">&#8211;</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70">1</td>
<td width="94">1</td>
<td width="95">&#8211;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>30</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Amazonas</strong></td>
<td width="75">11</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">0</td>
<td width="95">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>31</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>San Andrés</strong></td>
<td width="75">2</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">0</td>
<td width="95">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>32</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Caldas</strong></td>
<td width="75">27</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">0</td>
<td width="95">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong>33</strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Guainía</strong></td>
<td width="75">9</td>
<td width="69">&#8211;</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="70">&#8211;</td>
<td width="94">0</td>
<td width="95">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="27"><strong> </strong></td>
<td width="109"><strong>Total nacional</strong></td>
<td width="75"><strong>1.122</strong></td>
<td width="69"><strong>41</strong></td>
<td width="67"><strong>65</strong></td>
<td width="70"><strong>64</strong></td>
<td width="94"><strong>170</strong></td>
<td width="95"><strong>15%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Fuente: MOE</p>
<h2><strong>Municipios de vigilancia especial</strong></h2>
<p>Sobre 20 municipios que se presentan a continuación, la MOE solicitó a las autoridades una vigilancia especial y presencia de las autoridades responsables del normal desarrollo del proceso electoral. De acuerdo al estudio realizado por el grupo de expertos, en estos municipios se aumentó el nivel de riesgo a extremo para 2018.</p>
<table width="393">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="30"> </td>
<td width="166"><strong>Departamento</strong></td>
<td width="198"><strong>Municipio</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>1</strong></td>
<td width="166">Antioquia</td>
<td width="198">Briceño</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>2</strong></td>
<td width="166">Antioquia</td>
<td width="198">Cáceres</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>3</strong></td>
<td width="166">Antioquia</td>
<td width="198">Remedios</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>4</strong></td>
<td width="166">Antioquia</td>
<td width="198">San Andrés de Cuerquía</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>5</strong></td>
<td width="166">Antioquia</td>
<td width="198">Tarazá</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>6</strong></td>
<td width="166">Arauca</td>
<td width="198">Arauquita</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>7</strong></td>
<td width="166">Bolívar</td>
<td width="198">Arenal</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>8</strong></td>
<td width="166">Cauca</td>
<td width="198">Corinto</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>9</strong></td>
<td width="166">Chocó</td>
<td width="198">Bajo Baudó</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>10</strong></td>
<td width="166">Chocó</td>
<td width="198">Medio Baudó</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>11</strong></td>
<td width="166">Córdoba</td>
<td width="198">Buenavista</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>12</strong></td>
<td width="166">Córdoba</td>
<td width="198">Cotorra</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>13</strong></td>
<td width="166">Guaviare</td>
<td width="198">Miraflores</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>14</strong></td>
<td width="166">Meta</td>
<td width="198">Vistahermosa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>15</strong></td>
<td width="166">Nariño</td>
<td width="198">Barbacoas</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>16</strong></td>
<td width="166">Norte de Santander</td>
<td width="198">Convención</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>17</strong></td>
<td width="166">Norte de Santander</td>
<td width="198">El Carmen</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>18</strong></td>
<td width="166">Norte de Santander</td>
<td width="198">Hacarí</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>19</strong></td>
<td width="166">Norte de Santander</td>
<td width="198">La Playa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="30"><strong>20</strong></td>
<td width="166">Norte de Santander</td>
<td width="198">Teorama</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Fuente: MOE</p>
<h2><strong>En 31 municipios el riesgo indicativo de fraude disminuye tanto para Cámara de Representantes como para Senado</strong></h2>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/consolidadosenado.png">Ver mapa de riesgo electoral indicativo de fraude Senado</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/consolidadocamara.png">Ver mapa de riesgo electoral indicativo de fraude Cámara de Representantes</a></strong></p>
<p>Según los datos suministrados por la MOE, los factores indicativos de fraude, tanto en Cámara de Representantes como en Senado, han presentado leves disminuciones; mientras que para las elecciones de 2014 la MOE señalaba 410 municipios en riesgo para Senado y 386 municipios en riesgo para el Cámara de Representantes, para 2018 la MOE alertó riesgos en 379 municipios para Senado y 355 en Cámara.</p>
<p>Para Alejandra Barrios, directora de la MOE, “estamos viendo una leve disminución del riesgo asociado a las prácticas políticas locales, no obstante, los niveles de municipios con niveles extremos de riesgo aumentaron, lo que implica que las autoridades deben mantener acciones preventivas sobre posibles delitos e irregularidades electorales que se presenten en esos municipios”.</p>
<p>El informe de Mapas de riesgo electoral señala 45 municipios en riesgo extremo por factores indicativos de fraude en Cámara y 34 en Senado.</p>
<div id="attachment_2729" style="width: 563px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-2729" class="size-full wp-image-2729" src="https://www.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/consolidadosenado.png" alt="Mapa Riesgo Indicativo de fraude Senado" width="553" height="702" srcset="https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/consolidadosenado.png 553w, https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/consolidadosenado-236x300.png 236w, https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/consolidadosenado-440x559.png 440w" sizes="(max-width: 553px) 100vw, 553px" /><p id="caption-attachment-2729" class="wp-caption-text">Mapa Riesgo Indicativo de fraude Senado</p></div>
<p> </p>
<div id="attachment_2728" style="width: 562px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-2728" class="size-full wp-image-2728" src="https://www.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/consolidadocamara.png" alt="Mapa Riesgo Indicativo de fraude Cámara de Representantes" width="552" height="715" srcset="https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/consolidadocamara.png 552w, https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/consolidadocamara-232x300.png 232w, https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/consolidadocamara-440x570.png 440w" sizes="(max-width: 552px) 100vw, 552px" /><p id="caption-attachment-2728" class="wp-caption-text">Mapa Riesgo Indicativo de fraude Cámara de Representantes</p></div>
<h2><strong>Proceso de Paz eliminó el riesgo electoral por factores de violencia en 79 municipios</strong></h2>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/violencia_2018.png">Ver mapa de riesgos por factores de violencia</a></strong></p>
<div id="attachment_2735" style="width: 627px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-2735" class="size-full wp-image-2735" src="https://www.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/violencia_2018.png" alt="Mapa Riesgo consolidado factores de violencia" width="617" height="815" srcset="https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/violencia_2018.png 617w, https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/violencia_2018-227x300.png 227w, https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/violencia_2018-440x581.png 440w, https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/violencia_2018-585x773.png 585w" sizes="(max-width: 617px) 100vw, 617px" /><p id="caption-attachment-2735" class="wp-caption-text">Mapa Riesgo consolidado factores de violencia</p></div>
<p>Tal vez el cambio más drástico que señalan los Mapas de Riesgo Electoral de la MOE es el riesgo consolidado por factores de violencia. Para las elecciones de autoridades nacionales de 2014 se alertaban 389 municipios con riesgo y en 2015, 438 municipios; para las elecciones de Congreso y Presidente de 2018 la MOE alerta riesgos de violencia en 310 municipios, de los cuales 130 en riesgo medio, 122 en riesgo alto y 58 en riesgo extremo.</p>
<table width="642">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" width="32"> </td>
<td rowspan="2" width="127"><strong>Departamento</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="90"><strong>No. de municipios</strong></td>
<td colspan="3" width="201"><strong>Nivel de riesgo</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="79"><strong>Total  de municipios en riesgo</strong></td>
<td rowspan="2" width="114"><strong>Porcentaje del departamento en riesgo</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67"><strong>Medio</strong></td>
<td width="59"><strong>Alto</strong></td>
<td width="74"><strong>Extremo</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>1</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Guaviare</strong></td>
<td width="90">4</td>
<td width="67">2</td>
<td width="59">1</td>
<td width="74">1</td>
<td width="79">4</td>
<td width="114">100%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>2</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Chocó</strong></td>
<td width="90">30</td>
<td width="67">9</td>
<td width="59">8</td>
<td width="74">9</td>
<td width="79">26</td>
<td width="114">87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>3</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Arauca</strong></td>
<td width="90">7</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="59">2</td>
<td width="74">3</td>
<td width="79">6</td>
<td width="114">86%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>4</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Cauca</strong></td>
<td width="90">42</td>
<td width="67">7</td>
<td width="59">20</td>
<td width="74">4</td>
<td width="79">31</td>
<td width="114">74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>5</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Caquetá</strong></td>
<td width="90">16</td>
<td width="67">4</td>
<td width="59">6</td>
<td width="74"> </td>
<td width="79">10</td>
<td width="114">63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>6</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Córdoba</strong></td>
<td width="90">30</td>
<td width="67">7</td>
<td width="59">7</td>
<td width="74">2</td>
<td width="79">16</td>
<td width="114">53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>7</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Putumayo</strong></td>
<td width="90">13</td>
<td width="67">2</td>
<td width="59">4</td>
<td width="74"> </td>
<td width="79">6</td>
<td width="114">46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>8</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Meta</strong></td>
<td width="90">29</td>
<td width="67">6</td>
<td width="59">7</td>
<td width="74"> </td>
<td width="79">13</td>
<td width="114">45%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>9</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Norte de Santander</strong></td>
<td width="90">40</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="59">7</td>
<td width="74">9</td>
<td width="79">17</td>
<td width="114">43%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>10</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Cesar</strong></td>
<td width="90">25</td>
<td width="67">4</td>
<td width="59">4</td>
<td width="74">2</td>
<td width="79">10</td>
<td width="114">40%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>11</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Nariño</strong></td>
<td width="90">64</td>
<td width="67">9</td>
<td width="59">12</td>
<td width="74">4</td>
<td width="79">25</td>
<td width="114">39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>12</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Antioquia</strong></td>
<td width="90">125</td>
<td width="67">23</td>
<td width="59">14</td>
<td width="74">11</td>
<td width="79">48</td>
<td width="114">38%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>13</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Bolívar</strong></td>
<td width="90">46</td>
<td width="67">8</td>
<td width="59">6</td>
<td width="74">2</td>
<td width="79">16</td>
<td width="114">35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>14</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Valle del Cauca</strong></td>
<td width="90">42</td>
<td width="67">6</td>
<td width="59">5</td>
<td width="74">3</td>
<td width="79">14</td>
<td width="114">33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>15</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Tolima</strong></td>
<td width="90">47</td>
<td width="67">8</td>
<td width="59">5</td>
<td width="74">1</td>
<td width="79">14</td>
<td width="114">30%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>16</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Sucre</strong></td>
<td width="90">26</td>
<td width="67">6</td>
<td width="59"> </td>
<td width="74">1</td>
<td width="79">7</td>
<td width="114">27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>17</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Vichada</strong></td>
<td width="90">4</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="59"> </td>
<td width="74"> </td>
<td width="79">1</td>
<td width="114">25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>18</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Risaralda</strong></td>
<td width="90">14</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="59">1</td>
<td width="74">1</td>
<td width="79">3</td>
<td width="114">21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>19</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Caldas</strong></td>
<td width="90">27</td>
<td width="67">2</td>
<td width="59">3</td>
<td width="74">&#8211;</td>
<td width="79">5</td>
<td width="114">19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>20</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Quindío</strong></td>
<td width="90">12</td>
<td width="67">2</td>
<td width="59">&#8211;</td>
<td width="74">&#8211;</td>
<td width="79">2</td>
<td width="114">17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>21</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Vaupés</strong></td>
<td width="90">6</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="59">&#8211;</td>
<td width="74">&#8211;</td>
<td width="79">1</td>
<td width="114">17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>22</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Casanare</strong></td>
<td width="90">19</td>
<td width="67">2</td>
<td width="59">1</td>
<td width="74">&#8211;</td>
<td width="79">3</td>
<td width="114">16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>23</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>La Guajira</strong></td>
<td width="90">15</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="59">2</td>
<td width="74">&#8211;</td>
<td width="79">2</td>
<td width="114">13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>24</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Atlántico</strong></td>
<td width="90">23</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="59">1</td>
<td width="74">1</td>
<td width="79">3</td>
<td width="114">13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>25</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Huila</strong></td>
<td width="90">37</td>
<td width="67">2</td>
<td width="59">2</td>
<td width="74">&#8211;</td>
<td width="79">4</td>
<td width="114">11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>26</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Boyacá</strong></td>
<td width="90">123</td>
<td width="67">6</td>
<td width="59">3</td>
<td width="74">&#8211;</td>
<td width="79">9</td>
<td width="114">7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>27</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Santander</strong></td>
<td width="90">87</td>
<td width="67">3</td>
<td width="59">1</td>
<td width="74">2</td>
<td width="79">6</td>
<td width="114">7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>28</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Magdalena</strong></td>
<td width="90">30</td>
<td width="67">1</td>
<td width="59">&#8211;</td>
<td width="74">1</td>
<td width="79">2</td>
<td width="114">7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>29</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Cundinamarca</strong></td>
<td width="90">116</td>
<td width="67">5</td>
<td width="59">&#8211;</td>
<td width="74">&#8211;</td>
<td width="79">5</td>
<td width="114">4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>30</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Bogotá D.C.</strong></td>
<td width="90">1</td>
<td width="67"> &#8211;</td>
<td width="59"> &#8211;</td>
<td width="74">1</td>
<td width="79">1</td>
<td width="114">&#8211;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>31</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Amazonas</strong></td>
<td width="90">11</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="59">&#8211;</td>
<td width="74">&#8211;</td>
<td width="79">&#8211;</td>
<td width="114">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>32</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>San Andrés</strong></td>
<td width="90">2</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="59">&#8211;</td>
<td width="74">&#8211;</td>
<td width="79">&#8211;</td>
<td width="114">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"><strong>33</strong></td>
<td width="127"><strong>Guainía</strong></td>
<td width="90">9</td>
<td width="67">&#8211;</td>
<td width="59">&#8211;</td>
<td width="74">&#8211;</td>
<td width="79">&#8211;</td>
<td width="114">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32"> </td>
<td width="127"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td width="90"><strong>1.122</strong></td>
<td width="67"><strong>130</strong></td>
<td width="59"><strong>122</strong></td>
<td width="74"><strong>58</strong></td>
<td width="79"><strong>310</strong></td>
<td width="114"><strong>28%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="https://new.moe.org.co/publicacion/mapa-factores-riesgo-electoral-2014/">Mapa de Riesgo electoral 2014</a></p>
<h6><strong><a href="https://www.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Mapas_y_Factores_de_Riesgo_Electoral_MOE_Elecciones_en_Colombia_2018.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Descargue aquí el libro MOE: Mapas y Factores de Riesgo Electoral MOE Elecciones en Colombia 2018</a></strong></h6>
<h6> </h6>

<div class="wp-block-pdfemb-pdf-embedder-viewer"><a href="https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Mapas_y_Factores_de_Riesgo_Electoral_MOE_Elecciones_en_Colombia_2018.pdf" class="pdfemb-viewer" style="" data-width="max" data-height="max" data-toolbar="bottom" data-toolbar-fixed="off">Mapas_y_Factores_de_Riesgo_Electoral_MOE_Elecciones_en_Colombia_2018</a></div>


<div style="height:100px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<div class="wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-button"><a class="wp-block-button__link wp-element-button" href="https://new.moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Mapas_y_Factores_de_Riesgo_Electoral_MOE_Elecciones_en_Colombia_2018.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Descargar</a></div>
</div>



<div style="height:100px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
